Encouraging learning: Preteens (10-12 years)

Homework

Homework starts to count for more. In a review of US research, the link between homework and achievement was stronger in grades 7 to 12 than in kindergarten to grade 6, though every study had design flaws.¹¹³ The kind of parent involvement matters. In a research synthesis, parents setting rules about homework had a stronger link with achievement than other kinds of involvement.¹²⁴ Hands-on help is different. In a meta-analysis of 448 studies, nearly every kind of involvement had small positive links with achievement, engagement and motivation, but homework help went with lower achievement.¹¹¹ A meta-analysis of 50 middle school studies, now close to your child’s age, found the same exception: involvement helped, except help with homework.¹¹⁸ ≈ Mixed evidence. These are correlations, so they cannot say whether help lowers achievement or whether struggling children get more help.

• Hand the routine over: your child picks the time and place within your limits and sets it up.
• Be available for a question, then step back. Ask what they have tried before you give a hint.
• Check that it is done and handed in, not that every answer is right.
• If homework regularly takes far longer than the school expects, talk to the teacher together.

See also Homework.

Studying that sticks

Preteens start to study for tests, and the methods that feel productive are often the weakest. In two experiments with students, those who practiced recalling a passage remembered much more 2 days or 1 week later than those who reread it, even though rereading looked better after 5 minutes and felt more confident.¹⁵¹ A meta-analysis found practice tests more helpful than restudying or any other comparison, with the size of the benefit varying with the learners and the study.¹²⁶ A systematic review of 50 classroom experiments found medium or large benefits in most cases, though few took place outside Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic countries.¹²⁷ A major review of 10 study techniques rated practice testing and spaced practice as highly useful because they help learners of different ages and abilities,¹³⁷ and a meta-analysis of 317 experiments found that the best gap between study sessions grows as the time until the test grows.¹³²

• Flashcards or a covered page: answer from memory, check, sort into “know it” and “not yet”.
• Three short sessions on different days beat one long one the night before.
• After a chapter, close the book and write the five main points from memory.

Reading for pleasure

Reading for pleasure often drops off at this age, and it is worth protecting. In a meta-analysis of 99 studies, free-time reading had moderate to strong links with comprehension, reading and spelling from preschool to university; print exposure explained 13% of the variance in oral language skills in elementary school and 19% in middle school, and weaker readers seemed to benefit too. The authors describe an upward spiral, but the studies show links, not proof of cause.¹⁴⁷

• Let your child choose: series, comics, nonfiction, manga, audiobooks.
• Keep a family reading time rather than a rule about pages.
• Do not pay per book (see motivation).

Praise and mindset

The strongest praise research is on exactly this age. In six studies with fifth graders, children praised for intelligence rather than effort cared more about performing than learning and, after a failure, persisted less, enjoyed the task less and did worse.¹⁴⁹ In a study of 313 children with an average age of 10.4, praise for personal qualities, but not for what they did, made children more likely to feel ashamed after failure, especially those with low self-esteem.¹²⁸ ≈ Mixed evidence. Praise the strategy, the effort and the progress.

What about growth mindset?

Two large meta-analyses found the effects of growth mindset programs on achievement weak overall; in the later one, the small average effect was no longer significant after correcting for possible publication bias or in the highest-quality studies.¹⁵³¹⁴⁶ ≈ Mixed evidence. Another meta-analysis found effects (d = 0.14) for targeted groups when programs were delivered as designed, and a national US experiment in secondary schools found that a short online program raised lower achievers’ grades.¹²⁹¹⁶⁰ ≈ Mixed evidence. Process praise is a sensible daily habit; a mindset lesson on its own is not a lever.

Motivation and a say in the work

In a meta-analysis of 36 studies, parents’ support for their child’s autonomy was linked with higher achievement and with children’s own motivation, engagement, positive attitudes toward school and, most strongly, psychological health.¹⁵⁷ Autonomy support is not permissiveness.⁸⁰ Choice itself helps: in a meta-analysis of 41 studies, being given choices raised intrinsic motivation, effort and performance, and the boost was stronger for children than for adults.⁴⁶ Developmental researchers argue that part of the dip in motivation at the move to secondary school comes from a mismatch between early adolescents’ growing need for a say and schools and homes that give them less of one.⁷⁴

Rewards are debated. One meta-analysis of 128 studies found that rewards for doing, finishing or doing well at a task lowered later free-choice interest, with tangible rewards tending to be more harmful for children than for college students.¹³⁴ Another concluded that rewards are generally not harmful, and that rewards tied to the level of performance did not lower motivation.¹³¹ ≈ Mixed evidence. So whether money for grades backfires is disputed; both found harm from promised, tangible rewards for tasks that were already interesting.¹³⁴¹³¹

In practice: let your child decide the order of subjects, the study method and the time within your limits; explain the rules you keep; do not pay for reading or for hobbies they already love.

Focus, planning and self-control

A review names three core executive functions (self-control, working memory and mental flexibility) and notes that stress, lack of sleep, loneliness and lack of exercise each impair them.⁷² Programs for children aged 4-12 that improved these skills, from martial arts and aerobic exercise to games, mindfulness and school curricula, all involved repeated practice that grew harder over time.¹³⁵ ≈ Mixed evidence. A series of meta-analyses (children up to 12) found no convincing evidence that training gains last, and found that approaches that build these skills indirectly worked as well as or better than drills; the authors note they are more enjoyable for children.¹⁵⁵ ≈ Mixed evidence. In a cohort followed from birth to 32, childhood self-control predicted adult health, finances and offending along a gradient, a link rather than proof of cause.⁸⁷

• Planning is the new skill: a weekly planner, big projects broken into dated steps, a checklist for the school bag.
• A sport, an instrument or chess: activities that take practice and get harder.
• Phones out of sight during homework; one task at a time.

Sleep, screens and social media

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine, in a statement endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), recommends 9-12 hours of sleep in every 24 hours for ages 6 to 12, and links getting enough sleep regularly with better attention, behavior, learning, memory and emotional regulation.¹²³ A review concludes that sleep need does not decline through the teenage years even though sleep does; the loss comes from a mix of biological, psychological and social pressures.⁷⁰ In a review of 36 studies of school-aged children and adolescents, later bedtimes and shorter sleep were the outcomes most consistently related to electronic media use,¹¹² and a systematic review of 67 studies advises limiting screens especially before and during bedtime hours.¹¹⁷

The AAP’s 2016 policy statement for ages 5 to 18 asks families to make a Family Media Use Plan with consistent rules, boundaries on content and on sharing personal information, mentoring and open conversation, and says the evidence does not support a one-size-fits-all approach.¹¹⁴ Its 2026 statement adds that most platforms are designed to boost engagement and profit, not to support children’s health and development.¹²² On well-being itself, the best large studies find only small associations with technology use, explaining at most 0.4% of the variation, and a review judged the most rigorous findings unlikely to be of practical significance and unable to separate cause from effect.⁹⁰⁸⁹ ≈ Mixed evidence.

• Make the media plan with your child and write it down: which apps, when, where, and what to do when something online upsets them.
• Devices charge outside the bedroom; the last hour before bed is screen-free.
• Keep weekend sleep within an hour or two of weekday sleep.

More in Screens and screens on the By age page for this age.

Learning at home one-pager

Print the learning one-pager for this age

Sources

The small numbers in the text point to these sources. Each one has a full entry on the Research page.

46. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270-300. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270 Back to the text
70. Carskadon, M. A. (2011). Sleep in Adolescents: The Perfect Storm. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 58(3), 637-647. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2011.03.003 Back to the text
72. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168. See it on the Research page doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 Back to the text
74. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.2.90 Back to the text
80. Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 194-200. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/a0012754 Back to the text
87. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R., Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693-2698. See it on the Research page doi:10.1073/pnas.1010076108 Back to the text
89. Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336-348. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/jcpp.13190 Back to the text
90. Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173-182. See it on the Research page doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1 Back to the text
111. Barger, M. M., Kim, E. M., Kuncel, N. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2019). The relation between parents’ involvement in children’s schooling and children’s adjustment: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 855-890. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/bul0000201 Back to the text
112. Cain, N., & Gradisar, M. (2010). Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review. Sleep Medicine, 11(8), 735-742. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2010.02.006 Back to the text
113. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does Homework Improve Academic Achievement? A Synthesis of Research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62. See it on the Research page doi:10.3102/00346543076001001 Back to the text
114. Council on Communications and Media (2016). Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162592. See it on the Research page doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2592 Back to the text
117. Hale, L., & Guan, S. (2015). Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 21, 50-58. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2014.07.007 Back to the text
118. Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740-763. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/a0015362 Back to the text
122. Munzer, T., Parga-Belinkie, J., Milkovich, L. M., Tomopoulos, S., Ajumobi, T., Cross, C., Gerwin, R., Madigan, S., & American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Communications and Media (2026). Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Policy Statement. Pediatrics, 157(2), e2025075320. See it on the Research page doi:10.1542/peds.2025-075320 Back to the text
123. Paruthi, S., et al. (2016). Recommended Amount of Sleep for Pediatric Populations: A Consensus Statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 12(6), 785-786. See it on the Research page doi:10.5664/jcsm.5866 Back to the text
124. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent Involvement in Homework: A Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039-1101. See it on the Research page doi:10.3102/0034654308325185 Back to the text
126. Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659-701. See it on the Research page doi:10.3102/0034654316689306 Back to the text
127. Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2021). Retrieval Practice Consistently Benefits Student Learning: a Systematic Review of Applied Research in Schools and Classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1409-1453. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9 Back to the text
128. Brummelman, E., Thomaes, S., Overbeek, G., Orobio de Castro, B., van den Hout, M. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2014). On feeding those hungry for praise: Person praise backfires in children with low self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 9-14. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/a0031917 Back to the text
129. Burnette, J. L., Billingsley, J., Banks, G. C., Knouse, L. E., Hoyt, C. L., Pollack, J. M., & Simon, S. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work?. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3-4), 174-205. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/bul0000368 Back to the text
131. Cameron, J., Banko, K. M., & Pierce, W. D. (2001). Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues. The Behavior Analyst, 24(1), 1-44. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/bf03392017 Back to the text
132. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 Back to the text
134. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 Back to the text
135. Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions Shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4 to 12 Years Old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964. See it on the Research page doi:10.1126/science.1204529 Back to the text
137. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58. See it on the Research page doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 Back to the text
146. Macnamara, B. N., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2023). Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3-4), 133-173. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/bul0000352 Back to the text
147. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267-296. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/a0021890 Back to the text
149. Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33-52. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33 Back to the text
151. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x Back to the text
153. Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549-571. See it on the Research page doi:10.1177/0956797617739704 Back to the text
155. Takacs, Z. K., & Kassai, R. (2019). The efficacy of different interventions to foster children’s executive function skills: A series of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 145(7), 653-697. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/bul0000195 Back to the text
157. Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E. A., Fong, C. J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 605-644. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9329-z Back to the text
160. Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C. S., Hinojosa, C. P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S. M., Carvalho, C. M., . . . Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364-369. See it on the Research page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y Back to the text