When you have little time

The principle: small, predictable, every time

When time is short, put it where the research shows the biggest payoff. A meta-analysis of parenting programs found larger effects for those that taught positive parent-child interaction, time-out and the importance of consistency.¹¹ In another set of meta-analyses, only 3 of 26 parenting techniques were linked with stronger effects on disruptive behavior: positive reinforcement, praise in particular, and natural or logical consequences.¹⁶

On a busy day, that comes down to 4 habits:

• Notice good behavior out loud. It takes seconds: “Thanks for coming the first time I called.”
• Decide in advance what happens after the 2 or 3 behaviors that bother you most.
• Keep consequences small and calm, small enough to use every time.
• Say it once, then act. Skip lectures and repeated warnings.

The effort estimates on this page are practical judgments, not research findings. For the full approach these methods come from, see the best-proven approach.

A short time-out

A time-out is a few minutes away from attention and fun, right after a clear problem behavior. Use it for a short list of behaviors you name in advance, such as hitting, or not doing what you asked after one warning. It is not for babies.

1. Choose a dull spot ahead of time, away from toys and screens, where you can see your child: a chair, a step, a corner. Never lock a child in or use a dark or frightening place.
2. For not listening, give one warning. For hitting, skip the warning.
3. Say what happened and where to go, in a few calm words. Walk a young child there if needed.
4. Keep it short: a few minutes.
5. During the time-out, do not talk, argue or lecture. Stay where you can see your child.
6. When it ends, it is over. For not listening, repeat the instruction. Then watch for something to praise.

How long? A few minutes is enough to start with. That is practical advice, not a research finding: we found no verified study showing that longer time-outs work better for young children at home. The only study among our sources that compared time-out lengths directly was done with 20 residents of an institution, all with intellectual disabilities: 15 and 30 minutes worked about equally well, and 1 minute worked best when it came first but less reliably after the longer ones.⁵¹ That is a weak guide for home.

Two very small studies (4 children aged 3 and 4; 3 children, 2 of them with intellectual disabilities) found that time-out reduced problem behavior whether it lasted a fixed time or until the child stopped misbehaving, so you may not need to wait for perfect quiet.³²⁴² In a small study of 6 preschool boys, shortening the time-out when a boy went straight away made 4 of them more likely to go when told.³³

What does seem to matter is that the time-out lasts the length you set. In a small clinic study of 16 preschoolers, the authors concluded that, in that setting, enforcing a minimum time-out length was critical for children learning to comply.³¹ If your child gets up early, calmly bring them back. If that becomes a battle, see when a child refuses time-out and the back-up studies below.

The evidence. In a meta-analysis of experiments that changed one parenting behavior at a time, time-out for not listening robustly increased children’s compliance.⁴⁰ In a long-term US study of Early Head Start families, children whose parents reported using time-out at age 3 did not differ significantly from other children on any emotional, behavioral or parent-child relationship outcome through fifth grade.³⁹ Not every finding is reassuring: a cross-sectional study of 292 mothers and their 8- to 12-year-olds in 6 countries linked mothers’ use of time-out with more anxiety symptoms in children, as it did corporal punishment, expressing disappointment and shaming.³⁵ A study like that shows a link, not a cause. Two reviews that weighed the criticisms of time-out conclude that careful use is justified: one, looking at parenting programs, finds it beneficial for many children with conduct problems; the other says it generally enhances child well-being.⁴³³⁰ Studies have carried out time-out in many different ways, often without reporting the details, so there is no single tested recipe.³⁴

Effort (our estimate): a few minutes each time, plus about 10 minutes once to explain the rules while everyone is calm. The first 1-2 weeks take the most effort.

Step-by-step details and common mistakes: Time-out, used correctly. If your child needs help calming down more than a break from attention, see time-in.

Quick privilege removal

This suits children old enough to understand “later” and “tomorrow”, usually from preschool age up. For toddlers, move the object or the child instead.

1. Choose a few privileges in advance: screen time, a favorite toy, a trip to the park.
2. Take away something small, soon and short: tonight’s screen time, not a week of it.
3. Connect it to the behavior when you can: a thrown tablet goes away.
4. Say it once, calmly. Do not argue or bargain.
5. Give a clear way back.

The evidence. We found no study that tested privilege removal at home on its own, so the evidence here is indirect. When the privilege is connected to the behavior, it is a logical consequence, and natural and logical consequences were one of only 3 of 26 techniques linked with stronger effects of parenting programs on disruptive behavior.¹⁶ In a small classroom study of 4 aggressive preschoolers, losing a smiley face (with a reprimand) after each aggressive act, and earning a reward for keeping at least one, substantially reduced aggression; teachers and parents found it highly acceptable.⁴⁸

Effort (our estimate): under 1 minute each time, plus a few minutes once to choose the privileges. The hard part is follow-through: the tablet really does have to stay off.

Full guide: Privilege removal.

When-then

When-then puts what your child wants after what you need done. Use it for the daily grind: shoes, teeth, toys, homework.

1. Pair the task with something that is coming anyway, such as going out, dinner or a story, so it costs you nothing extra.
2. Say it once, as a plain fact rather than a threat.
3. Wait. Do not repeat yourself, argue or add bonuses.
4. If the task is not done, the “then” waits. Once it is done, follow through cheerfully.

The evidence. When-then is a simple everyday form of positive reinforcement, which was one of only 3 of 26 techniques linked with stronger effects of parenting programs on disruptive behavior.¹⁶ We found no study of when-then on its own, so treat it as a practical way to apply that principle, not a separately proven tool.

Effort (our estimate): a few seconds each time, and no setup. The hard part is waiting without nagging.

Full guide: When-then.

Planned ignoring

Planned ignoring is for minor behavior that seems aimed at getting a reaction: whining, pestering, fake crying. You take the reaction away, then give warm attention back the moment the behavior stops.

1. Decide in advance which minor behaviors you will ignore. Never ignore hitting, danger, damage, or a child who is hurt or truly upset.
2. When it starts, look away, keep a neutral face and carry on with what you are doing.
3. The moment it stops, or your child asks nicely, turn back with warm attention.
4. If it gets louder at first, hold steady. Giving in at the loudest moment rewards the loudest version.
5. Agree on it with the other adults at home, so nobody gives in.

The evidence. In a meta-analysis of experiments, briefly ignoring a child after they did not do as asked robustly increased compliance.⁴⁰ Those experiments tested ignoring after noncompliance, not ignoring whining.

Effort (our estimate): no extra time each time, but it takes real self-control, plus a quick talk to get the other adults at home on board.

Full guide: Planned ignoring.

Routines that prevent the fight

The quickest discipline is the argument that never starts. A predictable routine for your hardest time of day replaces a stream of separate instructions with one familiar sequence.

1. Pick one flashpoint: getting out the door, dinner or bedtime.
2. Write down the same steps in the same order. For young children, use pictures; the routine chart is ready to print.
3. Let the chart be the boss.
4. Keep it the same on most days, and notice the steps your child does.

The evidence. In a 3-week randomized study of 405 mothers and their babies or toddlers, a consistent nightly bedtime routine improved children’s sleep (faster sleep onset, fewer and shorter night wakings) and mothers’ mood.¹²¹ A review of 52 studies found behavioral approaches effective for bedtime problems and night wakings in young children.¹²⁰ A review of 32 publications linked family routines with parenting competence and children’s adjustment, though its studies had methodological limits, so they show links rather than proof.¹¹⁵

Effort (our estimate): 1-2 evenings to set up, then little or no extra time each day once it is running.

Full guide: Routines and visual schedules. For evenings, see also preventing bedtime battles.

Effort at a glance

These are our practical estimates, not research findings.

Method	Each time	Setup
Short time-out	A few minutes	About 10 minutes, once, to explain the rules
Privilege removal	Under 1 minute	A few minutes to choose the privileges
When-then	A few seconds	None
Planned ignoring	No extra time	A quick talk with the other adults at home
Routines	Little or none	1-2 evenings

Every method has the same hard part: doing it the same way each time, including on tired days.

Is a quick spank faster?

When you are rushed, a spank can look like the fastest fix. Here is what the research says about that. For both sides in full, see what most research finds, what proponents argue and where they disagree.

What the studies found

The time-out back-up studies. The research closest to the busy-parent question asks what to do when a child will not stay in time-out. One well-researched, standardized parenting program used a spank when a child left time-out.³¹

• In a 1981 study, co-authored by Roberts, of 24 noncompliant preschoolers referred to a clinic, time-out increased compliance both when parents decided when it ended (with time and behavior requirements, and a spanking procedure for leaving early) and when children could end it themselves. But the gains when children ended it were judged clinically insignificant.²⁹ Only the parent-release group had the spanking back-up, so the two groups differed in two ways at once, and the study cannot show whether spanking made the difference.
• A 1983 study, also co-authored by Roberts, tested the back-up directly with 16 noncompliant preschoolers referred to a clinic. When children left time-out, a no-spank “barrier” procedure and spanking were equally effective at increasing compliance, and physical punishment did not appear to be a critical component. The authors concluded that enforcing a minimum time-out length was critical in that setting.³¹ The study’s published summary does not describe what the barrier was.

What proponents point to. A 2024 meta-analysis of controlled longitudinal studies, by researchers on the minority side, found that customary spanking explained less than 1% of the remaining variance in each child outcome after controlling for children’s earlier adjustment. The authors attribute harmful-looking results to residual confounding, point to large effects of spanking used to enforce time-out in clinic programs for defiant young children, and discourage blanket injunctions against spanking.⁶² A 2000 review by Larzelere, a leading proponent, reported benefits such as less noncompliance and fighting mainly when nonabusive spanking was used to back up milder discipline with 2- to 6-year-olds, and attributed detrimental outcomes in longitudinal studies chiefly to overly frequent use.⁵⁹

What most research finds. Meta-analyses of spanking covering 111 effect sizes from 160,927 children found that 13 of 17 mean effects were significant, and all of them linked spanking with a higher risk of detrimental outcomes.⁵⁵ An earlier meta-analysis found corporal punishment associated with higher immediate compliance, but also with more aggression, lower moral internalization and worse mental health.⁵⁴ A review of 69 prospective studies found that physical punishment consistently predicted increases in behavior problems and was not associated with positive outcomes over time.⁵⁷ In its 2018 policy statement, the American Academy of Pediatrics states that aversive discipline, including physical punishment, is minimally effective in the short term and not effective in the long term, and recommends against it.⁶⁴

So, for a busy parent: no peer-reviewed source on this site shows that physical discipline is faster or more effective for busy parents. In a study that compared a spanking back-up directly with a non-physical one, the non-physical back-up worked as well.³¹ If your child will not stay in time-out, see when a child refuses time-out. If you are about to hit, see what to do instead.

The bottom line

• A few seconds of attention for good behavior, many times a day.
• When-then for daily tasks; one routine for your hardest time of day.
• A short, calm time-out or a small privilege removal for the few behaviors that matter most, every time.
• Ignore the small stuff; never ignore danger.
• A spank is not a proven shortcut: in a direct test, a non-physical back-up worked as well.³¹

With a preteen, the same pieces hold, with more negotiation: agree on the when-then pairs and the privilege in advance, keep the consequence short, and spend the minutes you save on listening. Harsh control and guilt go with more behavior problems; warmth with clear limits goes with slightly fewer.⁹¹ See warmth with limits on the Preteens page.

When you have more time, getting started with the best-proven approach shows how these pieces fit together.

Sources

The small numbers in the text point to these sources. Each one has a full entry on the Research page.

11. Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., Filene, J. H., & Boyle, C. L. (2008). A Meta-analytic Review of Components Associated with Parent Training Program Effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(4), 567-589. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9 Back to the text
16. Leijten, P., Gardner, F., Melendez-Torres, G. J., et al. (2019). Meta-Analyses: Key Parenting Program Components for Disruptive Child Behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 58(2), 180-190. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.07.900 Back to the text
29. Bean, A. W., & Roberts, M. W. (1981). The effect of time-out release contingencies on changes in child noncompliance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 9(1), 95-105. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/bf00917860 Back to the text
30. Dadds, M. R., & Tully, L. A. (2019). What is it to discipline a child: What should it be? A reanalysis of time-out from the perspective of child mental health, attachment, and trauma. American Psychologist, 74(7), 794-808. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/amp0000449 Back to the text
31. Day, D. E., & Roberts, M. W. (1983). An analysis of the physical punishment component of a parent training program. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11(1), 141-152. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/bf00912184 Back to the text
32. Donaldson, J. M., & Vollmer, T. R. (2011). An Evaluation and Comparison of Time-Out Procedures With and Without Release Contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 693-705. See it on the Research page doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-693 Back to the text
33. Donaldson, J. M., Vollmer, T. R., Yakich, T. M., & Van Camp, C. (2013). Effects of a Reduced Time-Out Interval on Compliance With the Time-Out Instruction: Compliance With Time-Out. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(2), 369-378. See it on the Research page doi:10.1002/jaba.40 Back to the text
34. Everett, G. E., Hupp, S. D. A., & Olmi, D. J. (2010). Time-out with parents: A descriptive analysis of 30 years of research. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(2), 235-259. See it on the Research page doi:10.1353/etc.0.0091 Back to the text
35. Gershoff, E. T., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Zelli, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A. (2010). Parent Discipline Practices in an International Sample: Associations With Child Behaviors and Moderation by Perceived Normativeness. Child Development, 81(2), 487-502. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01409.x Back to the text
39. Knight, R. M., Albright, J., Deling, L., Dore-Stites, D., & Drayton, A. K. (2020). Longitudinal Relationship Between Time-Out and Child Emotional and Behavioral Functioning. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 41(1), 31-37. See it on the Research page doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000725 Back to the text
40. Leijten, P., Gardner, F., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Knerr, W., & Overbeek, G. (2018). Parenting behaviors that shape child compliance: A multilevel meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0204929. See it on the Research page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204929 Back to the text
42. Mace, F. C., Page, T. J., Ivancic, M. T., & O’Brien, S. (1986). Effectiveness of brief time-out with and without contingent delay: A comparative analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19(1), 79-86. See it on the Research page doi:10.1901/jaba.1986.19-79 Back to the text
43. Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2011). Parental Use of Time Out Revisited: A Useful or Harmful Parenting Strategy?. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 1-8. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/s10826-010-9371-x Back to the text
48. Reynolds, L. K., & Kelley, M. L. (1997). The efficacy of a response cost-based treatment package for managing aggressive behavior in preschoolers. Behavior Modification, 21(2), 216-230. See it on the Research page doi:10.1177/01454455970212005 Back to the text
51. White, G. D., Nielsen, G., & Johnson, S. M. (1972). Timeout Duration and the Suppression of Deviant Behavior in Children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(2), 111-120. See it on the Research page doi:10.1901/jaba.1972.5-111 Back to the text
54. Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 539-579. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.539 Back to the text
55. Gershoff, E. T., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 453-469. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/fam0000191 Back to the text
57. Heilmann, A., Mehay, A., Watt, R. G., Kelly, Y., Durrant, J. E., van Turnhout, J., & Gershoff, E. T. (2021). Physical punishment and child outcomes: a narrative review of prospective studies. The Lancet, 398(10297), 355-364. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00582-1 Back to the text
59. Larzelere, R. E. (2000). Child outcomes of nonabusive and customary physical punishment by parents: An updated literature review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(4), 199-221. See it on the Research page doi:10.1023/a:1026473020315 Back to the text
62. Larzelere, R. E., Gunnoe, M. L., Pritsker, J., & Ferguson, C. J. (2024). Resolving the Contradictory Conclusions from Three Reviews of Controlled Longitudinal Studies of Physical Punishment: A Meta-Analysis. Marriage & Family Review, 60(7), 395-433. See it on the Research page doi:10.1080/01494929.2024.2392672 Back to the text
64. Sege, R. D., Siegel, B. S., Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, & Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health (2018). Effective Discipline to Raise Healthy Children. Pediatrics, 142(6), e20183112. See it on the Research page doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3112 Back to the text
91. Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 53(5), 873-932. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/dev0000295 Back to the text
115. Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration?. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 381-390. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.381 Back to the text
120. Mindell, J. A., Kuhn, B., Lewin, D. S., Meltzer, L. J., & Sadeh, A. (2006). Behavioral Treatment of Bedtime Problems and Night Wakings in Infants and Young Children. Sleep, 29(10), 1263-1276. See it on the Research page doi:10.1093/sleep/29.10.1263 Back to the text
121. Mindell, J. A., Telofski, L. S., Wiegand, B., & Kurtz, E. S. (2009). A Nightly Bedtime Routine: Impact on Sleep in Young Children and Maternal Mood. Sleep, 32(5), 599-606. See it on the Research page doi:10.1093/sleep/32.5.599 Back to the text