WeiMeiJiao Warm, firm discipline from birth to age 12

By age

Preteens (10-12 years)

Puberty may be starting, friends matter more than ever, and your child wants a say in the rules. Discipline now runs on trust: fewer orders, more negotiation, clear limits that still hold, and a relationship your child wants to confide in.

Start here

  1. Keep one unhurried time each day when your child can talk and you mostly listen. What parents know about their children’s lives comes mainly from what the children choose to tell them.95
  2. Once a term, go through the rules together: which decisions are now your child’s, which are shared, and which stay yours. Children who saw no growing say in family decisions turned more sharply toward peers.77
  3. Make a family media plan with your child, with consistent rules and devices charging outside bedrooms at night.114112
  4. Keep consequences brief and related, and drop the lectures and guilt trips. Harsh control and psychological control have the strongest links with behavior problems; warmth and clear limits go with fewer.91
  5. Know your child’s friends and where they spend their time, by being someone they tell rather than someone who checks up.83

What’s normal at this age

Between 10 and 12, your child is still a child who needs you, and a young person who needs to be treated as one. Several things change at once.

Puberty often begins. With it come body changes, more need for privacy and quicker moods. In a meta-analysis of 101 articles, puberty that came earlier than peers’ was linked with more emotional and behavior problems across every domain measured, in boys as well as girls, with small effects (d about 0.20).104 An early-maturing child is not doing anything wrong; they may simply need more of your calm and more of your time.

Friends matter more, and peers pull harder. In pooled samples of more than 3,600 people aged 10 to 30, the ability to resist peer influence grew steadily between 14 and 18 but showed little growth between 10 and 14.96 In other words, your 10- to 12-year-old is at the age when peers weigh most and the brakes are weakest. A review of longitudinal and experimental evidence found that “deviancy training” within adolescent friendships predicted increases in delinquency, substance use and violence, and that grouping high-risk young adolescents together for interventions made problem behavior worse.73 Knowing who your child’s friends are matters more now, not less.

Arguments get hotter. Meta-analyses of parent-child conflict across adolescence found little support for the idea that conflict rises and then falls: the rate of conflict declined from early to mid-adolescence, but its heat increased from early to mid-adolescence and with puberty.84 Expect fewer but fiercer arguments, and plan for them.

Lies get more sophisticated. In an experiment with 8- to 16-year-olds left alone with the answers to a test, most peeked, and how well they covered it up, but not whether they lied at all, went with their executive functioning skills.75 Catching every lie is a losing game. Making the truth safe to tell is not.

Sleep need does not fall. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine, in a 2016 consensus statement, still recommends 9 to 12 hours a day for children aged 6 to 12.123 A review concludes that although teenagers sleep less from late childhood on, the weight of evidence is that their need for sleep does not decline; the lost sleep comes from a mix of biological, psychological and social pressures.70 Screens are one of those pressures: in a review of 36 studies of school-aged children and adolescents, later bedtimes and shorter sleep were the outcomes most consistently related to media use.112

Screens and social media. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ 2016 policy statement for ages 5 to 18 lists benefits (new ideas, knowledge, social contact and support) alongside risks (weight and sleep, inappropriate content and contacts, privacy), and says the evidence does not support a one-size-fits-all approach.114 On the bigger fear, that technology itself is harming young people’s well-being, the research is more reassuring than the headlines: across three large datasets of 355,358 adolescents, the association between technology use and well-being was negative but small, explaining at most 0.4% of the variation.90 A review of the field found mostly correlational studies with a mix of small positive, negative and null associations, and judged the most rigorous findings unlikely to be of practical significance; cause and effect remain unclear.89 That is not a reason to drop limits on sleep, content and contacts, which the pediatric statement still asks for. It is a reason not to panic.

It is not too late. Two meta-analyses of parenting programs, including children up to age 11, found no evidence that programs work better when started earlier in childhood.9

What works, and why

The core does not change: warmth, clear expectations and calm, consistent consequences (see the best-proven approach). What changes is the balance: more listening, more negotiation, more trust handed over step by step.

Warmth with limits, and a growing say

Two large meta-analyses set the frame for this age. Across 1,435 studies, parental warmth, behavioral control (clear rules and follow-through), autonomy granting and an authoritative style (warm and demanding at once) showed very small to small negative links with children’s and adolescents’ behavior problems, while harsh control and psychological control (guilt, shaming, withdrawing love) showed the strongest positive links, and the links ran in both directions.91 Across 1,015 studies, the same pattern held for anxiety and depression symptoms.92 So keep the limits, keep the warmth, and give up the guilt trips.

Know their life because they tell you

Parents are often told to monitor preteens more closely. The research on what “monitoring” really is points elsewhere. In a study of 703 Swedish 14-year-olds, what parents knew came mainly from what their children freely told them, and that disclosure, not the parents’ tracking, was the source of knowledge most closely linked with less delinquency; the authors conclude that tracking and surveillance is not the best prescription for parents.95 In a second study of 1,186 14-year-olds, parents’ control efforts were linked with good adjustment only once the children’s feelings of being controlled, which went with poor adjustment, were set aside.83 Both samples were a few years older than your child, and a review of 47 later studies concludes that inadequate monitoring is a risk factor for conduct problems and that the knowledge behind it is largely driven by what children choose to disclose.93

What this means in practice: be the person your child tells. Keep an unhurried time every day, in the car, over dinner or at bedtime, when you listen more than you talk. React to bad news with calm first. Know their friends and the friends’ parents, and make your home the easy place to hang out. Ask where they are going and who with, as a matter of course rather than suspicion. See connection time.

Hand over decisions, step by step

In a study of 1,771 sixth and seventh graders, children who believed their parents kept asserting power and did not relax restrictions, and children who saw few chances to take part in family decisions, with none added as they grew, were higher in an extreme orientation toward peers and more likely to seek advice from peers instead of parents.77 A meta-analysis of 36 studies found parents’ autonomy support linked with higher achievement, more motivation and engagement at school and better psychological health.157 Developmental researchers argue that some of the dips in motivation seen in early adolescence come from a mismatch between young people’s growing need for a say and environments, at school and at home, that give them less of one.74

So review the rules together. Sort them into three piles: your child’s own decisions now (what to wear, how to spend pocket money), shared decisions (bedtime on weekends, which activities) and yours (safety, screens at night, school). Move something from the second pile to the first every few months. See offering choices and family meetings.

Screens: a plan made together

The pediatric policy statement for ages 5 to 18 asks parents to make a Family Media Use Plan: a balance of media time that fits the child’s stage, consistent rules, boundaries on content and on sharing personal information, mentoring, and open conversation about what happens online.114 Make the plan with your child, not for them, and write it down. Devices charge outside the bedroom at night: later bedtimes and shorter sleep are the most consistent findings on media and sleep,112 and a systematic review of 67 studies advises limiting screens especially before and during bedtime hours.117 Social media is where the plan needs the most detail: which apps, at what age, who they can message, and what to do when something upsets them. See screens.

Homework and school: structure, then step back

Homework starts to count for more. In US research, the link between homework and achievement was stronger in grades 7 to 12 than in kindergarten to grade 6, though every study had design flaws.113 Parents’ rules about homework had a stronger link with achievement than other kinds of involvement,124 while hands-on help went with lower achievement in a meta-analysis of 448 studies and in a meta-analysis of middle schoolers; both are links, not proof of cause.111118 Agree on the routine, stay nearby, and let the work be theirs. How to study is on the Encouraging learning page for this age.

Friends, bullying and peer trouble

Listen first when friendships go wrong; this is where your child learns to handle people. Take bullying seriously. A meta-analysis of prospective and cross-sectional studies found that children exposed to negative parenting were more likely to be bullied, while good communication, a warm relationship, involvement and supervision were protective, with small to moderate effects.85 A meta-analysis of 44 evaluations found that school anti-bullying programs cut bullying by 20 to 23% and victimization by 17 to 20%, and that programs with parent meetings and firm discipline were among the more effective ones.102 If your child is being hurt or excluded again and again, go to the school with specifics and ask what program it runs.

Honesty and trust

Thank your child for a hard truth before you deal with what they did. In an experiment with 4- to 8-year-olds, expecting punishment weakened the appeal to children’s own standards of honesty.99 With a preteen, keep the consequence for the deed related and short, and separate it from the lie: “The lie costs you the phone for the evening. The broken window we fix together.” Say exactly how trust is earned back, and notice when it is. See lying and privilege removal.

Family meetings and solving problems together

A weekly meeting gives arguments somewhere to go. For problems that keep coming back, work through them together: define the problem, hear both sides, list options, pick one to try, review it next week. The evidence comes from clinic trials with children with serious behavior problems: in a randomized trial with 7- to 14-year-olds with oppositional defiant disorder, a collaborative problem-solving approach worked as well as parent management training, and in both groups about half the children were much improved,44 and in a trial with 7- to 13-year-olds referred for severe antisocial behavior, problem-solving skills training combined with parent training worked better than either alone.12 See solving problems together.

The move to secondary school

The jump to middle school (or its equivalent where you live) brings more teachers, more homework and a new social world at exactly the moment your child wants more independence. Researchers describe the risk as a mismatch: a young person who needs more say meets a bigger, more controlling environment.74 At home you can supply the fit: keep routines steady in the first term, ask about the new school every day without interrogating, give more responsibility for homework and getting ready, and hold the family meeting weekly until things settle.

What backfires

Harsh control and guilt. Across 1,435 studies, harsh control and psychological control (guilt, shaming, withdrawing love) had the strongest links with behavior problems, and the links ran both ways: behavior problems also went with harsher parenting later.91 In a study of mothers and 8- to 12-year-olds in 6 countries including China, yelling and expressing disappointment were linked with more aggression and shaming with more anxiety.35 A US study of 13-year-olds, a little older than your child, linked harsh verbal discipline with more behavior problems and depressive symptoms a year later, and parental warmth did not soften the link.65

Checking up instead of being told. Parents’ control efforts were linked with good adjustment only after children’s feelings of being controlled, which went with poor adjustment, were set aside.83 Reading a diary or scrolling a phone behind your child’s back buys a little information at the price of the disclosure that protects them most.

Tightening the rules, or giving no say. Sixth and seventh graders who saw their parents hold on to power and offer no growing part in decisions were more likely to turn sharply toward peers.77

Lectures and nagging. Not a research finding, just a pattern every parent of a preteen recognizes: the longer the speech, the less of it lands. One sentence, then stop.

Spanking. In a study in 6 countries including China, more physical discipline went with more aggression and anxiety in children aged 6 to 17, however normal it was seen to be.58 In its 2018 policy statement, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends against it.64 A minority of researchers argue that such links are largely due to other differences between families.62 The Physical discipline page lays out both sides.

Screens in the bedroom. Later bedtimes and shorter sleep are the most consistent findings on media and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents.112

Things you can say

When your child starts talking Tell me about it. I’ll listen before I say anything.
Reviewing the rules Which of these do you think you’re ready to handle on your own now?
The media plan Phones charge in the kitchen at 9. That’s the plan we made together, and it’s the same for me.
After a lie You lost my trust on this one. Here’s how you can earn it back: a week of telling me where you are, straight.
Inviting the truth I’d rather hear bad news from you than find out later. Nothing you tell me will make me stop loving you.
When an argument heats up I’m not going to argue about this now. Let’s talk at dinner, when we’re both calm.
Friend trouble That sounds really hard. Do you want ideas, or do you just want me to listen?
After you lost your temper I shouted, and that’s on me. I’m sorry. Can we start again?

Sources

The small numbers in the text point to these sources. Each one has a full entry on the Research page.

  1. Gardner, F., Leijten, P., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Landau, S., Harris, V., Mann, J., Beecham, J., Hutchings, J., & Scott, S. (2019). The earlier the better? Individual participant data and traditional meta-analysis of age effects of parenting interventions. Child Development, 90(1), 7-19. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/cdev.13138 Back to the text
  2. Kazdin, A. E., Siegel, T. C., & Bass, D. (1992). Cognitive problem-solving skills training and parent management training in the treatment of antisocial behavior in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 733-747. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0022-006x.60.5.733 Back to the text
  3. Gershoff, E. T., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Zelli, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. A. (2010). Parent Discipline Practices in an International Sample: Associations With Child Behaviors and Moderation by Perceived Normativeness. Child Development, 81(2), 487-502. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01409.x Back to the text
  4. Ollendick, T. H., Greene, R. W., Austin, K. E., Fraire, M. G., Halldorsdottir, T., Allen, K. B., Jarrett, M. A., Lewis, K. M., Whitmore Smith, M., Cunningham, N. R., Noguchi, R. J. P., Canavera, K., & Wolff, J. C. (2015). Parent Management Training and Collaborative & Proactive Solutions: A Randomized Control Trial for Oppositional Youth. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(5), 591-604. See it on the Research page doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1004681 Back to the text
  5. Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Dodge, K. A., Malone, P. S., Oburu, P., Palmérus, K., Bacchini, D., Pastorelli, C., Bombi, A. S., Zelli, A., Tapanya, S., Chaudhary, N., Deater-Deckard, K., Manke, B., & Quinn, N. (2005). Physical Discipline and Children’s Adjustment: Cultural Normativeness as a Moderator. Child Development, 76(6), 1234-1246. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00847.x Back to the text
  6. Larzelere, R. E., Gunnoe, M. L., Pritsker, J., & Ferguson, C. J. (2024). Resolving the Contradictory Conclusions from Three Reviews of Controlled Longitudinal Studies of Physical Punishment: A Meta-Analysis. Marriage & Family Review, 60(7), 395-433. See it on the Research page doi:10.1080/01494929.2024.2392672 Back to the text
  7. Sege, R. D., Siegel, B. S., Council on Child Abuse and Neglect, & Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health (2018). Effective Discipline to Raise Healthy Children. Pediatrics, 142(6), e20183112. See it on the Research page doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3112 Back to the text
  8. Wang, M.-T., & Kenny, S. (2014). Longitudinal Links Between Fathers’ and Mothers’ Harsh Verbal Discipline and Adolescents’ Conduct Problems and Depressive Symptoms. Child Development, 85(3), 908-923. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/cdev.12143 Back to the text
  9. Carskadon, M. A. (2011). Sleep in Adolescents: The Perfect Storm. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 58(3), 637-647. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2011.03.003 Back to the text
  10. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755-764. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.9.755 Back to the text
  11. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.2.90 Back to the text
  12. Evans, A. D., & Lee, K. (2011). Verbal deception from late childhood to middle adolescence and its relation to executive functioning skills. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1108-1116. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/a0023425 Back to the text
  13. Fuligni, A. J., & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Perceived parent-child relationships and early adolescents’ orientation toward peers. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 622-632. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.622 Back to the text
  14. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366-380. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.366 Back to the text
  15. Laursen, B., Coy, K. C., & Collins, W. A. (1998). Reconsidering Changes in Parent-Child Conflict across Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis. Child Development, 69(3), 817-832. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.00817.x Back to the text
  16. Lereya, S. T., Samara, M., & Wolke, D. (2013). Parenting behavior and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim: A meta-analysis study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(12), 1091-1108. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.001 Back to the text
  17. Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336-348. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/jcpp.13190 Back to the text
  18. Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(2), 173-182. See it on the Research page doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1 Back to the text
  19. Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 53(5), 873-932. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/dev0000295 Back to the text
  20. Pinquart, M. (2017). Associations of Parenting Dimensions and Styles with Internalizing Symptoms in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis. Marriage & Family Review, 53(7), 613-640. See it on the Research page doi:10.1080/01494929.2016.1247761 Back to the text
  21. Racz, S. J., & McMahon, R. J. (2011). The Relationship Between Parental Knowledge and Monitoring and Child and Adolescent Conduct Problems: A 10-Year Update. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14(4), 377-398. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/s10567-011-0099-y Back to the text
  22. Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental Monitoring: A Reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072-1085. See it on the Research page doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00210 Back to the text
  23. Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531-1543. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531 Back to the text
  24. Talwar, V., Arruda, C., & Yachison, S. (2015). The effects of punishment and appeals for honesty on children’s truth-telling behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 209-217. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.011 Back to the text
  25. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7(1), 27-56. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1 Back to the text
  26. Ullsperger, J. M., & Nikolas, M. A. (2017). A meta-analytic review of the association between pubertal timing and psychopathology in adolescence: Are there sex differences in risk?. Psychological Bulletin, 143(9), 903-938. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/bul0000106 Back to the text
  27. Barger, M. M., Kim, E. M., Kuncel, N. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2019). The relation between parents’ involvement in children’s schooling and children’s adjustment: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 855-890. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/bul0000201 Back to the text
  28. Cain, N., & Gradisar, M. (2010). Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review. Sleep Medicine, 11(8), 735-742. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2010.02.006 Back to the text
  29. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does Homework Improve Academic Achievement? A Synthesis of Research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62. See it on the Research page doi:10.3102/00346543076001001 Back to the text
  30. Council on Communications and Media (2016). Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162592. See it on the Research page doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2592 Back to the text
  31. Hale, L., & Guan, S. (2015). Screen time and sleep among school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 21, 50-58. See it on the Research page doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2014.07.007 Back to the text
  32. Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740-763. See it on the Research page doi:10.1037/a0015362 Back to the text
  33. Paruthi, S., et al. (2016). Recommended Amount of Sleep for Pediatric Populations: A Consensus Statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 12(6), 785-786. See it on the Research page doi:10.5664/jcsm.5866 Back to the text
  34. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent Involvement in Homework: A Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039-1101. See it on the Research page doi:10.3102/0034654308325185 Back to the text
  35. Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E. A., Fong, C. J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 605-644. See it on the Research page doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9329-z Back to the text